I too have been having this problem, which is still not fixed in Mendeley. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #45 (comment). Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub Thank you very much! I greatly look forward to test it :).įrom: ReichenHack [ Saturday, Ap11:45 AM Import or export - too hard, too slim a use-case. I'm not going to do dynamic groups for either The things you could search on in jabref to make the dynamic groups differĮntirely from zotero's. The dynamic groups will be hard because their format is undocumented, and getService().wrappedJSObject įrom: ReichenHack [ Saturday, Ap11:51 AM There is documentation for client, but, when I try to declare the Zotero object, there is an error So, it is to hard to determine the collection name from each item and write it to an bibtex item (for example groups item)? It can work without child collections. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub /issues/45#issuecomment-40865125 It's certainly not structurally roundtrip-safe. Import and export are slightly lossy because jabrefs and zotero's internal I don't recommendĮxporting back-and-forth between jabref and zotero though, as both the I'll see if I can implementĮxporting existing collections to static groups. Out the static groups took a bit of doing. Groups, as there is no documentation for how they're stored even figuring It already imports static groups from jabref. My exporter already adds the keywords to the exported entries, and Jabref groups are non-standard bibtex usage Īnd they are stored in bibtex comments, not in fields in individualĮntries. It is simple to use the static groups, or dynamic groups.Īh, you mean jabref groups. The biggest problem is obtain the collection names from each items. I don't recommend exporting back-and-forth between jabref and zotero though, as both the import and export are slightly lossy because jabrefs and zotero's internal models differ. I'll see if I can implement exporting existing collections to static groups. It doesn't yet import search groups, as there is no documentation for how they're stored even figuring out the static groups took a bit of doing. My exporter already adds the keywords to the exported entries, and it already imports static groups from jabref. Jabref groups are non-standard bibtex usage and they are stored in bibtex comments, not in fields in individual entries. Than it is simple to use the static groups, or dynamic groups.įrom: ReichenHack [ Saturday, Ap10:23 AMĪh, you mean jabref groups. Is 'groups' a bibtex field? Is it documented somewhere? When there will be the same field in import and export section, there will be the possibility to fast swiching between JabRef and Zotero. When you add the configuration option, with bibtex group name field it will be perfect. I think, that this is the best way to allow exporting collections to JabRef. Many people add new field for example groups to avoid overwrite the keywords field. The point is to add the collection names from Zotero to specified bibtex field for example keywords. If all entries in your database have suitable keywords in their keywords field, using this type of group might be the best choice. This method does not require manual assignment of entries, but uses information that is already present in the database. keywords) contains a certain keyword (e.g. This is the documentation about groups from JabRef:ĭynamic groups based on keyword search contain entries in which a certain BibTeX field (e.g.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |